Another NTSB Report On A Tesla Fatality Wreck

Telsa Model 3 crash
Credit: NTSB
I remember with horror the details of this fatal accident when it happened. Just the thought of someone hitting a tractor trailer at almost 70 miles per hour with enough force to sheer the top off the car and continue through to the other side, is beyond terrifying. We had results on a different Tesla crash a few weeks ago here. Here is the latest report from the National Traffic Safety Board’s findings, as stated in a press release:

Highway Accident Brief 20/01 details the NTSB’s investigation of the collision of a 2018 Tesla Model 3 car with a 2019 International semi-tractor trailer on U.S. Highway 441 in Delray Beach, in which the 50-year-old driver of the car died. The 45-year-old truck driver was uninjured.

The crash happened as the truck was attempting to cross the southbound lanes of U.S. 441 and turn left into the northbound lanes. As the truck approached the stop sign at the intersection, it slowed but did not come to a full stop before beginning to cross the southbound lanes of the highway. The car driver, traveling southbound at a recorded speed of 69 mph, did not apply the brakes nor take any other evasive action to avoid the truck crossing in front of him.

The Tesla hit the left side of the trailer just aft of its midpoint. The roof of the car was sheared off as the car struck the trailer, traveled under it, and continued south before coasting to a stop in the median about 1,680 feet from the point of impact.

System performance data from the Tesla showed the driver was operating with the “Autopilot” engaged at the time of the collision. Data from the vehicle indicated the Tesla was traveling in the right lane of U.S. 441 when the driver activated the Traffic-Aware Cruise Control at a cruise speed of 69 mph – 12.3 seconds before impact. The driver engaged “Autosteer” 2.4 seconds later, which activated the “Autopilot” partial automation driving system. The system did not detect steering wheel torque for the final 7.7 seconds before the collision.

The car’s forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking systems did not activate before the crash and there was no evidence of system- or driver-applied braking or steering before impact. NTSB investigators noted in the report that the Delray Beach highway operating environment, like the cross-traffic conditions found in a 2016 Williston, Florida, crash, was clearly outside the “Autopilot” system’s operational design domain in that the highway did not have limited access (it had 34 intersection roadways and private driveways in the 5-mile region encompassing the crash location).

Tesla Owners READ THIS!

Tesla informed the NTSB that the installed forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking systems on the Model 3 Tesla in the Delray Beach crash were not designed to activate for crossing traffic or to prevent crashes at high speeds and therefore, according to Tesla, the “Autopilot” vision system did not consistently detect and track the truck as an object or threat as it crossed the path of the car.

(Editor’s note: Tesla is essentially saying that the emergency braking and Autopilot systems are not designed to pick up on something the size of an 18-wheeler).

This is what the driver would have seen if he had been paying attention. This picture is from the frontal camera of the Tesla:

Screenshots from Tesla camera
(Still images from the Model 3 Tesla involved in the fatal March 1, 2019, Delray Beach crash on U.S. 441, showing the southbound view in the 5 seconds before the crash. Images courtesy of Tesla, cropped by NTSB.)

The NTSB determined the probable cause of the fatal crash to be the truck driver’s failure to yield the right of way to the car, combined with the car driver’s inattention due to overreliance on automation, which resulted in the car driver’s failure to react to the presence of the truck. Contributing to the crash was the operational design of Tesla’s partial automation system, which permitted disengagement by the driver, and the company’s failure to limit the use of the system to the conditions for which it was designed. The failure of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to develop a method of verifying manufacturers’ incorporation of acceptable system safeguards for vehicles with Level 2 automation further contributed to the crash.

To read the NTSB report click here.
Related Articles
Special Guest: Fiat Chrysler North American Head of Quality
This Saturday, July 11, on the Car Pro Show at 9:35 AM central, we are honored to have Mark Champine, Head of Quality, FCA - North America on the Dallas show to talk about Dodge topping the J.D Power ... More ›
Navigating The Road Ahead During the COVID-19 Crisis: Your Car Questions Answered
If you’re like us, you’ll never again take for granted the freedom to get in your car and head to your local grocery store to pick up a few things. The ability to do so is just one way transportation ... More ›
Auto Safety Technology People Disable The Most
We are big proponents of driver assist features here at the Car Pro and Car Pro Show Host Jerry Reynolds has even given us a rundown of his favorite driver-assist features. Overall, driver assistance ... More ›
2020 J.D. Power Initial Quality Survey Results Has Surprises!
The J.D. Power 2020 Initial Quality Study (IQS) for 2020, takes an updated look at the problems owners are having with their new vehicles, including those related to new technologies. The iconic study... More ›
There haven't been any comments left on this blog yet. Be the first to add one!.